<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Bowl Ads Near Sell-out &#8230; WHY?????</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnsondirect.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnsondirect.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/</link>
	<description>Johnson Direct Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:23:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheyenne - PR Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnsondirect.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheyenne - PR Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsondirect.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>First observation: Marvin Donkey must work in advertising, because you certainly hit a nerve. But branding, advertising, or whatever for the sake of making a splash is just a grand gesture. However, depending on the purpose, if it is part of a well-planned, strategic overall plan, then it does have a place. The problem is that Super Bowl ads seem to have taken on a life of their own, to the point where they are no longer effective as ads because they&#039;ve become entertainment. I&#039;ve made a similar point in my most recent blog (I hope) about publicity, one of the many tools in the PR exec&#039;s toolbox - and since I took your name in vain in the post, I thought I&#039;d better make sure to let you know I tend to agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First observation: Marvin Donkey must work in advertising, because you certainly hit a nerve. But branding, advertising, or whatever for the sake of making a splash is just a grand gesture. However, depending on the purpose, if it is part of a well-planned, strategic overall plan, then it does have a place. The problem is that Super Bowl ads seem to have taken on a life of their own, to the point where they are no longer effective as ads because they&#8217;ve become entertainment. I&#8217;ve made a similar point in my most recent blog (I hope) about publicity, one of the many tools in the PR exec&#8217;s toolbox &#8211; and since I took your name in vain in the post, I thought I&#8217;d better make sure to let you know I tend to agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsondirect</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnsondirect.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsondirect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsondirect.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response, Marvin.

Marketing today is about accountability, not branding and unaided awareness.  I could be wrong, but poll some recent CMOs who were brand evangelists, if you can find them.  I think they last on their jobs 18 months on average.

I think you may have heard of GEICO, MBNA, Capital One and Victoria&#039;s Secret?  How were these brands launched?  DM.

I guess they must not have understood that, as you put it, &quot;Advertising and sales are different marketing functions for a reason.  Sentence branding to the same rules as direct marketing and you&#039;ll lose all mind-share and only have your pennies to count.&quot;

Oreck, Dell, Lands&#039; End, Sears ... should I go on?

DM has now taken over as the dominant spend in advertising and marketing.  And for good reason.  It works!

Grant Johnson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response, Marvin.</p>
<p>Marketing today is about accountability, not branding and unaided awareness.  I could be wrong, but poll some recent CMOs who were brand evangelists, if you can find them.  I think they last on their jobs 18 months on average.</p>
<p>I think you may have heard of GEICO, MBNA, Capital One and Victoria&#8217;s Secret?  How were these brands launched?  DM.</p>
<p>I guess they must not have understood that, as you put it, &#8220;Advertising and sales are different marketing functions for a reason.  Sentence branding to the same rules as direct marketing and you&#8217;ll lose all mind-share and only have your pennies to count.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oreck, Dell, Lands&#8217; End, Sears &#8230; should I go on?</p>
<p>DM has now taken over as the dominant spend in advertising and marketing.  And for good reason.  It works!</p>
<p>Grant Johnson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marvin clonky</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnsondirect.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>marvin clonky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsondirect.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/super-bowl-ads-near-sell-out-why/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>You have a problem with branding?

Which cash cow of a brand do you resent spending money on &quot;killer creative?&quot; Bud Light, Got Milk?, Nationwide, Mastercard, Dove...?

Take shots at idiots like GoDaddy, fine. They have no brand (though last time I checked, their lights are still on). But a crapload of insight and strategy goes into a successful brand before the registers start to ring.

Advertising and sales are different marketing functions for a reason. Sentence branding to the same the rules as direct marketing and you&#039;ll lose all mind-share and only have your pennies to count.

And finally, something DM will never understand, big rewards require risk. Deadenbacher (Miller Lite was fired, rightfully) was a risk that failed horribly. Fail harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a problem with branding?</p>
<p>Which cash cow of a brand do you resent spending money on &#8220;killer creative?&#8221; Bud Light, Got Milk?, Nationwide, Mastercard, Dove&#8230;?</p>
<p>Take shots at idiots like GoDaddy, fine. They have no brand (though last time I checked, their lights are still on). But a crapload of insight and strategy goes into a successful brand before the registers start to ring.</p>
<p>Advertising and sales are different marketing functions for a reason. Sentence branding to the same the rules as direct marketing and you&#8217;ll lose all mind-share and only have your pennies to count.</p>
<p>And finally, something DM will never understand, big rewards require risk. Deadenbacher (Miller Lite was fired, rightfully) was a risk that failed horribly. Fail harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
